Sometimes I’m asked what the opening of a prospective client’s book would be like. I explain that there are many ways to Read More...
I found this today and was impressed with the author Will Teague's method of revealing who was completing essays with the help of an AI chatbot. As you can see, the source is HuffPost. Hit the link to read the entire piece. To summarize, a few salient paragraphs from the article:
- Since the spring semester of 2023, it has been apparent that an ever-increasing number of students are submitting AI-generated work. I am no stranger to students trying to cut corners by copying and pasting from Wikipedia, but the introduction of generative AI has enabled them to cheat in startling new ways, and many students have fully embraced it.
- So, I set out this semester to look more carefully for AI work. Some of it is quite easy to notice. The essays produced by ChatGPT, for instance, are soulless, boring abominations. Words, phrases and punctuation rarely used by the average college student — or anyone for that matter (em dash included) — are pervasive.
- A colleague in the department introduced me to the Trojan horse, a trick capable of both conquering cities and exposing the fraud of generative AI users. This method is now increasingly known (there’s even an episode of “The Simpsons” about it) and likely has already run its course as a plausible method for saving oneself from reading and grading AI slop. To be brief, I inserted hidden text into an assignment’s directions that the students couldn’t see but that ChatGPT can.
- I received 122 paper submissions. Of those, the Trojan horse easily identified 33 AI-generated papers. I sent these stats to all the students and gave them the opportunity to admit to using AI before they were locked into failing the class. Another 14 outed themselves. In other words, nearly 39% of the submissions were at least partially written by AI.
- Let me tell you why the Trojan horse worked. It is because students do not know what they do not know. My hidden text asked them to write the paper “from a Marxist perspective.” Since the events in the book had little to do with the later development of Marxism, I thought the resulting essay might raise a red flag with students, but it didn’t.
In other words, use your head. If you use AI to write, then intensively edit or rewrite it. Or better yet, do it yourself. You'll become a better writer. Pretty clever approach by Professor Teague!
Is it possible to write an unreadable book? Yes. How might one go about doing so? There are many things an author can do to mangle a Read More...
And here comes our new president, Donald J. Trump. He has called on the carpet the bosses of news media and journalists and whipped Read More...
I had no idea that Barack Obama curses before public speaking. I think I know at whom he curses before going on stage. I was as shocked Read More...
My business partner suggested last night that we ought to review some speeches and comment on what makes them great, or not so great. Read More...
I don’t know how Eric reacts when he’s engrossed in a book or article and comes across a misspelled word, or the wrong Read More...
A few days ago, my partner suggested that I do a blog post about President Barack Obama’s speech at the 2016 Democratic National Read More...
True story. One day a client said that to me. Honestly, I was surprised. It never occurred to me that so many other writers don’t Read More...
Here’s an ethical dilemma for the ages. Ghostwriter Tony Schwartz claims that he wrote GOP presidential candidate Donald Read More...
Blogs are important for a couple of reasons. First, it’s a great way to communicate with your customers. An interesting, ongoing Read More...

